RENDERO - RENDER REVIEW NOTES
Use one record for each generated attempt. Keep the original files.
This worksheet contains no measured result or recommended model setting.

1. THE DESIGN DECISION
Project / view:
Review date:
Reviewer:
Intended use (concept discussion / material study / other):
One change to test:
Approved design elements that must remain:

2. INPUT AND SETTINGS
Source application and named scene / camera:
Base image filename, dimensions and aspect ratio:
AI model and version as shown in the app:
Output size:
Full prompt:
Reference image filenames and intended role:
Base / reference influence, if exposed by the chosen model:
Time of day / season, if used:
Seed and seed mode, if exposed:
Upscaler / other settings:

For a regional edit:
Selection or ID-map filename:
Does it match the base image's view, crop and boundaries?
Selected region:
Region instruction:
Nearby fixed details to inspect:

3. WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED
Output filename / task identifier:
Actual generation duration (state what it includes):
Actual credits used, as recorded by the app:
Preparation and review time (record separately):
Intended changes achieved:
Unexpected changes inside the selection:
Unexpected changes outside the selection:
Roof / silhouette / openings / frames:
Material boundaries / junctions / ground contact:
Crop or camera changes:

4. DECISION
Accepted / refine / rejected:
Reason:
Next action (mask / prompt / settings / source model):
What will change in the next attempt?

For a comparison, keep model/version, input, aspect ratio, references and
other settings consistent except for the one change you are testing.
Include rejected attempts in your total time and credit calculation.
Never treat a pleasing image as evidence of dimensional accuracy.

Guide: https://www.rendero.ai/clay-render-to-photorealistic
Selection review:
https://www.rendero.ai/why-segmentation-matters-for-architectural-accuracy